[QuadList] Intersync and Lock Up
Chill315 at aol.com
Chill315 at aol.com
Mon Aug 24 08:16:46 CDT 2009
The discussions and humor is very interesting.
I had the last version of the Inter-Sync produced. The machines were
manufactured in the early 70's. It was very stable. The only reason that we
let the head run for 30 minutes was to get the guide up to temperature. We
found that the tip penetration would change as we edited if this was not
done.
I also had a TR-60 that was serial number 5. It would lock up in a little
longer time than the 1200's. Every mod that was put out by RCA was done
to the machine but it still did not help. The biggest problem was getting a
good solid lack of jitter from the machine. Timing was always an issue.
It did not have a stable 3.58 phase relationship with other sources.
Always a couple of degrees off each time it played. It worked great as a dub
source but through the switcher doing match frames was not the best.
Regarding the rolling of tape stock from ready or not ready. The reel
boost comes on for about 1.5 seconds after the play button is pushed. This is
in all cases. The guide comes in depending on if it is up to speed.
Typically 1 second as determined by the sequence controller. The pinch roller
is the same. If the head is not turning, than the time for the two events
is about 3.8 seconds.
So which is better, letting the tape be under the control of the take up
and supply voltages setting the torque or letting the capstan control the
speed? I think the answer is really depending on the reel and tape pack
sizes on the two turntable. I can see where the reel torques will either have
the tape too slow or too fast before capstan engagement. Perhaps this is
why the vacuum columns were invented on the AVR-1.
This would be an interesting discussion to have with the engineers that
designed the transport systems.
Chris Hill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20090824/88918bec/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the QuadList
mailing list