[QuadList] AMPEX Mark Ten 5 mil head

Trevor Brown videovault at sky.com
Thu Dec 3 04:18:38 CST 2009


Lydia
Yes tape was £1 per min when the £1 was worth much more than today
and educational budgets were much tighter than the broadcasters.

Trevor  also in the UK


-----Original Message-----
From: quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com
[mailto:quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com] On Behalf Of Pappas, Lydia
Sent: 03 December 2009 10:07
To: quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com
Subject: Re: [QuadList] AMPEX Mark Ten 5 mil head

 
I have several hundred Quad tapes which, as far as I can find out, look
like they are all recorded at 7 1/2. They are causing me problems trying
to get them transferred, over here in the UK. They are educational
recordings and I am wondering if they were recorded that way to save
money on tape - is this probable?

Lydia 'the lurker'

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:15:30 -0000
From: "Dale Lamm" <dlamm1 at neo.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [QuadList] AMPEX Mark Ten 5 mil head
To: "Quad List" <quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>
Message-ID: <D5E183FEC3A84C62B620DEDDA6DA5034 at compaq>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

[snip]

Back in the day, I saw very few 7 1/2 ips recordings that were not low
band...but of course, most of my quad experience back then was in
educational television.

[end]

First time I saw 7.5 IPS in use was in the late 70's at a cable company
head end. HBC on a TR-600, might have been Warner Brothers ownership.
The operator said they could get an entire feature movie on a "90
minute" roll of tape. Since there was just one TR-600, reel changes
would have been a problem.




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com Your
subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideota
pegroup.com

End of QuadList Digest, Vol 18, Issue 2
***************************************
-----------------------------------------
THIS E-MAIL AND ANY ATTACHED FILES ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE
LEGALLY PRIVILEGED.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution or other dissemination or use of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error please notify the sender immediately and then
delete this e-mail. 
Opinions, advice or facts included in this message are given
without any warranties or intention to enter into a contractual
relationship with the City of London unless specifically indicated
otherwise by agreement, letter or facsimile signed by a City of
London authorised signatory. Any part of this e-mail which is
purely personal in nature is not authorised by the City of London.

All e-mail through the City of London's gateway is potentially the
subject of monitoring. All liability for errors and viruses is
excluded. Please note that in so far as the City of London falls
within the scope of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or the
Environmental Information Regulations 2004, it may need to disclose
this e-mail.
Website: http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk

_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegr
oup.com





More information about the QuadList mailing list