[QuadList] Transistors for Ampex AVR-2?
C. Park Seward
park at videopark.com
Tue Feb 10 19:16:36 CST 2009
Exactly, Steve. I have a 1200 and have found it easy to work on. I do
have some Ampex ICs and others do have some limited spare parts.
I haven't found any problem yet in finding transistors for the 1200,
usually NTE replacements. I haven't had to replace any yet but did buy
a few as backup.
The AVR-2 should reproduce a better picture. One of my 1200 have the
NEC TBC so I would put that up against the 2. Replacing most of the
electrolytics has also helped in the servo stability and video & audio
noise.
I guess it also depends on the application. Is it for the rare dub or
will it be used for exacting reproduction of high-end programs?
Personally, I would take an AVR 1 or 3 over the 2.
Best,
Park
C. Park Seward
Technical Manager
KABC-TV
"An Evening at the Academy Awards"
Cell: 818-535-2747
Home: 949-679-1870
KABC office 818-863-7331
Visit us: http://www.videopark.com
On Feb 10, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Steve Davis wrote:
> We are weighing the purchase of an Ampex AVR-2 vs. an Ampex
> VR-1200. The AVR-2 is loaded with proprietary IC chips which are an
> obvious concern for replacement if (when) they fail. The AVR-2 is
> more versatile and uses discrete components on the boards so it is
> ostensibly more straightforward to repair. However, the transistors
> are germanium, which are hard to come by in 2009. Does anyone have
> an opinion on this and, better yet, does anyone have a good source
> for replacement components for the AVR-2?
>
> Many thanks,
> Steve Davis
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20090210/a226f177/attachment-0005.html>
More information about the QuadList
mailing list