[QuadList] Assemble edits vs Insert edits (wasOMG!!!!)

[Trevor Brown]

When we recorded programmes in sections for a later edit
We would crash record
Would not risk insert if the track has a hole, and there was not time to
spot check the recording and we would be in trouble
Also pre roll would be a problem with a studio, who would give the record
cue and start the clock on the studio floor
So crash would be the safest mode

TrevorB
UK member

-----Original Message-----
From: quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com
[mailto:quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com] On Behalf Of C. Park Seward
Sent: 31 January 2010 18:09
To: Quad List
Subject: Re: [QuadList] Assemble edits vs Insert edits (wasOMG!!!!)

Hi Ted,

Yes, I would expect clips to be crash recorded. But I'm talking about a
finished program.

Anyone have a date when Quad editing was widely available? I guess 1965 was
too early.

Best,
Park

C. Park Seward
Visit us: http://www.videopark.com




On Jan 30, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Ted Langdell wrote:

> If the segments on the tape were designed to be rolled into a live or live
to tape show, that might have been the practice. Particularly in the days
before any way of assemble editing was available.
> 
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 12:18 PM, C. Park Seward wrote:
> 
>> I recently dubbed a low band monochrome show from 1965 that had hard
records on the tape to join all the segments. Was it common back then to
assemble a show with hard records??? I can understand going in with a crash
if the tape was a stop-and-start camera original but for a final air master?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Park
>> 
>> C. Park Seward
> 
> Ted Langdell
> Secretary

_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegr
oup.com