[QuadList] Changes in Post over the years (wasElectronic Editing Notes)

[Trevor Brown]

More and more interesting
Our 7800's did not have flying erase hence the 3 seconds to cycle out of
insert,
Unless you used short insert and ran without erase, then the video head
erased the track
but if it was not central on the track it patterned badly and was not a mode
I liked to use.

If you were editing on a different machine to the recording you also had the
interchange problem
The 7800 only had three guides entry exit and back so the track was   "S"
shaped

Never saw a 7900 and cannot remember what the VRP 1 Arrangement was, the
VPR2 that guided all around the scanner made more sense
and the interchange was better for the straight tracks


TrevorB
UK Member

-----Original Message-----
From: quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com
[mailto:quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com] On Behalf Of C. Park Seward
Sent: 30 January 2010 23:13
To: Quad List
Subject: Re: [QuadList] Changes in Post over the years (wasElectronic
Editing Notes)

It looked as good as Type "C". Don has the 7900 in great shape.

Best,
Park

C. Park Seward
Visit us: http://www.videopark.com




On Jan 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Don Norwood wrote:

> I still have a couple of 7900's.  Park has seen one of them and I think he
would agree that the quality is quite good.


_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegr
oup.com