[QuadList] TBC

[Chill315 at aol.com]

Actually the TR-70 B was a good machine.  The C version with the  TCR 100 
servo has its issues.  The AVR-1 is a great machine but it is more  costly to 
run.  Myself, I am an Ampex man.  That is why I like the  VR-1200.  
 
As far as I know with all the documentation that I have, there was  never 
an AVVR-2 that was multi standard.  The main frame was built so that  either 
set of boards could be plugged into the machine.  Great design  feature that 
Ampex had.  They thought this out very well.
 
Your biggest problem is the NTSC and PAL need.  I wish there was a  simple 
way around that.  
 
I did see some time ago an ad for an AVR-2 in Switzerland.  This would  be 
a PAL only machine.
 
Chris Hill
 
 
In a message dated 4/29/2011 11:32:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
srdbx at netvision.net.il writes:

Why is  that? I thought that maybe an old TBC might be able to handle 
this? Has  anyone tried this before? Also, what do I do with LB on an 
AVR-2? Ken Zin  looks very busy at the moment I doubt he'll have time for 
me now to talk  about his cards. Is the avr-1 and tr-70 the only 
multistandard  machines?
Shai

On 29/04/2011 11:00,  quadlist-request at quadvideotapegroup.com wrote:
> The problem is that the  TBC must be designed for segmented scan.  VERY 
FEW
> ever were, and  I'm not aware that any on the market today or in recent 
years
> will  work for anything other than non-segmented (helical)  scan.
>

_______________________________________________
Please  trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to  QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest  options are  here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegr
oup.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20110429/c665d832/attachment-0005.html>