[QuadList] Question of the week

[Bill Carpenter]

Hi David and Folks,

There was no reason to build the AVR-1 with a DTBC, becuase the buffer worked so well.

The AVR-1 was out of production, when the ACR-25 was still being built and sold and the "B" version reduced building costs and test labor.

I was the product manager for the ACR-25, in1976 for a short time (maybe four months), and then turned it over to Boh Bohunicky, who worked with the "B" model, and added the DTBC.

So, no DTBC in a AVR-1 from Ampex

Bill carpenter



Bye for now, love to all, Bill & Gewyn & Ginger (whoof...whoof)

--- On Tue, 3/1/11, David Crosthwait <david at dcvideo.com> wrote:

From: David Crosthwait <david at dcvideo.com>
Subject: Re: [QuadList] Question of the week
To: "Quad List" <quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011, 8:22 AM

Don,
There was an AVR-1 with a digital TBC that was basically the same as what was in an AVR-2. However, I am not aware that the digital TBC version of the AVR-1 was a "B" model. I don't think that many were produced. The ACR25B had basically the same digital TBC. 
David


On Feb 28, 2011, at 3:11 PM, Don Norwood wrote:
And when I posted the AVR-1B, I was not sure if there was a digital TBC version of the AVR-1 as there was with the ACR.  So it was a guess, but Chris said there were 21 and that was the only way I could get there.  So if there wasn't a "B", then Park will be disillusioned because I will have made two mistakes! Don----- Original Message -----From: Chill315 at aol.comTo: quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.comSent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:20 PMSubject: Re: [QuadList] Question of the week
I think this is the list.  But was there a B version of the AVR-1?   The B version of the ACR-25 had the digital TBC rather than the glass delay lines. I would like to know if there were B versions of the 1001 or 1002. Bill, your turn on this one.  The rest are complete as far as I know. It shows how much more we care about the Ampex brand than that other one.  We know the Ampex brand a lot better and I would be that most of the machines still in existence and running are Ampex. Chris Hill In a message dated 2/28/2011 11:23:01 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, dwnorwood at embarqmail.com writes:Steve: The 1195 was not a real Ampex model, just a name used by some for the updated machines.  The VR-1500 was helical scan.  So I've deleted those and added to your list........ VR-1000VR-1000BVR-1000CVR-1001VR-1002VR-1100VR-1100/EVR-1200VR-1200 BVR-1200 CVR-1200/EVR-2000VR-2000BVR-3000VR-3000BAVR-1AVR-1BAVR-2AVR-3ACR-25ACR-25B  
Don Norwood
Digitrak Communications, Inc.
www.digitrakcom.com 
 
_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com






-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20110301/954c460d/attachment-0005.html>