[QuadList] Fuji vs 3M tape

[bill.spencer at northstarstudios.tv]

I've always found Fuji to hold up better to storage than the other
brands.  It always seemed thinner to me so maybe there is less material
to pick up moisture.  I will say that the 1" stock doesn't do as well as
the 2" does for Fuji, but still better than the other brands.

Bill Spencer
NorthStar Studios, Inc.
3201 Dickerson Pike
Nashville, TN 37207
(615) 650-6610
CP (615) 445-5616

-----Original Message-----
From: quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com
[mailto:quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com] On Behalf Of C. Park
Seward
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 10:33 AM
To: Quad List
Subject: [QuadList] Fuji vs 3M tape

While prepping a large transfer job, I noticed two Fuji Quad reels amid
the hundreds of 3M 400 reels. So far, every 3M reel I have examined will
need baking. When I looked at the Fuji tape, it was perfect! No
shedding, no sticky. It even packed perfectly.

I used Fuji as my primary tape in the 80 and 90s. I have always liked
it. The tape is a bit stiffer than 3M and the one Ampex reel is quite a
but softer than the 3M. 

Cheers to Fuji! I'd be interested to hear what others have found
comparing tape stock.

Best,
Park

C. Park Seward
Cell: 818-535-2747
Home: 541-476-6657
2" Quad and 1" "C" transfers
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Visit us: http://www.videopark.com




_______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com Your
subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideota
pegroup.com