[QuadList] save htis and look tr4 converts to hi band but alsoneed modul...

[David Crosthwait]

Ed,

Congratulations on your acquisition. The TR 5 was a stripped down machine that enabled it to be more mobile. Therefore many of the correction circuits used to fully reproduce a broadcast quality playback picture were not included in this machine. Although the recording will be a good one (if all is working OK), you will only see demodulated video upon play back that will give you a good sense that a recording was made. Without the RCA correction circuitry such as CATC for color time base correction, CAVEC for velocity correction and the color dropout compensator option, the recovered picture (depending on the options used as on any 2" machine) may be raw, flickering color (if color is present). So in the remote truck, the operator upon conclusion of a record session could verify that a recording had been made by playing back this "demod" picture. An analysis of the FM (RF) and control track signals on the scope added further confidence that all was OK. An experienced operator who knew the machine well would have a better sense of confidence than one who was not, therefore being more at ease with a "demod" only picture. It is a bit of a leap of faith to tell the director in the truck that all will look fine upon playback of his show in the studio on a fully optioned playback machine.

Years later when the first portable field one-inch type C VTR's came out such as the Sony BVH 500, it was typical to confirm the integrity of the recording by observing the same "demod" only picture with no time base correction.

Your might be interested to know that the RCA list price for a TR 5 was $20, 950 in 1966.

Best Regards,

David Crosthwait
DC Video
Videotape Transfers and More!

Offices located at:
177 West Magnolia Blvd.
Burbank, CA. 91502
818-563-1073
818-563-1177 (fax)
818-285-9942 (cell)

david at dcvideo.com
www.dcvideo.com

Follow DC Video on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/dcvideo
 

On Apr 6, 2012, at 8:52 AM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:

> Don!  wow  I did  not save those pictures and now that it had ended they are small.... could  you send me  the set!?
>  
> We are so happy  to  have this  unit.   it was actually used  from the  other  side of the country so has no actual AZ heritage...  but is a lo  hour usage machine
>  
> As far as we know... this is the last  quad in Arizona... if there are others  I would love to hear  about it..   there was one other  a few years back but I only found out about it   the day before someone swooped in  from out of state to  grab it.  Ironically, the fellow that owned it found out about  me  after  he  had committed to some one else it.... I tried to call them as  they were driving in to Arizona and offered  them a large  chunk of  money  to turn the truck around to no avail.  we still talk on a regular basis and  he  may be helping  with this  unit, although it is an earlier  one than  he  has  worked on.
>  
>  
>  
>  In a message dated 4/6/2012 7:22:50 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, dwnorwood at embarqmail.com writes:
> Ahh..... you got the Phil Van Praag machine!  He posted very good pics of it for the auction and I saved them for future reference.  Here's one that shows the front of the machine.  It has the 2 editor modules installed and an aftermarket Vamco digital timer. 
>  
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying.
> 
> Change subject to reflect thread direction. Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20120406/258906d2/attachment-0005.html>