[QuadList] OT: is S-VHS "obsolete" in copyright law's eyes?
chill315 at aol.com
chill315 at aol.com
Mon Feb 27 11:17:39 CST 2012
I was always under the impression that the only real advantage of S-video was on the TV set end. By avoiding the chroma separation circuits in the TV you got a little bit better picture. The change in the quality was not that much as far as I was concerned.
The quality difference between regular and S VHS to me was not that great.
Chris Hill
On Feb 27, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Walter Forsberg <walterforsberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All-
>
> I'm wondering if anyone might corroborate my impression that there are no DVD/VHS combination decks currently being manufactured that support native output of S-VHS. Looking around, it seems like while S-VHS tapes can be read by some of the combo decks still-in-production, the signal is down-rezzed (terms like "quasi-playback" are used) to VHS levels of resolution.
>
> Thanks, in advance, for any thoughts!
>
> Walter Forsberg
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying.
>
> Change subject to reflect thread direction. Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com
More information about the QuadList
mailing list