[QuadList] Deck degaussing--What's the current practice among QuadList users?

[Ted Langdell]

Chris, 

Sounds like you're saying that its better to invest the relatively short amount of time to degauss the tape path often rather than to have un-repairable damage to archive or customer tape's content that can't be replaced or restored.

What is the current practice among our QuadList users?

On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Chill315 at aol.com wrote:
> 
> Wayne
>  
> I could not afford to even do the additional passes.  The client in the post production business will not accept any damage to their tape.  And now, it is even more critical in the transfer business.  I can see where this would apply in the broadcast station where tape gets reused a lot.  We would have to eat the time and tape costs to do any work over that was damaged in this method.  So our standards were different than many other places.

Ted

Ted Langdell
Secretary

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20120725/0d9aecb0/attachment-0005.html>