[QuadList] QuadQuiz--Why did RCA choose 6-mil head width for Super High Band experiments

[trandoc at aol.com]

Ted,

Super High Band allowed the use of 7 1/2 IPS to achive the same S/N and needed narrow heads to avoid guard band issues. 

I guess Type C doomed quad use by this time?

Harold

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Langdell <ted at quadvideotapegroup.com>
To: QuadList <QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com>
Sent: Sun, Jun 30, 2013 4:59 pm
Subject: [QuadList] QuadQuiz--Why did RCA choose 6-mil head width for Super High Band experiments




 

What was RCA's rationale for choosing to use 6-mil heads for their experiments with Super High Band on a TR-70C?


Some SMPTE members may know the answer.


Bonus question:  Why didn't Super High Band (or Ampex's Super High Band Pilot) get any marketplace traction.


Good luck and hope your part of the country is staying relatively cool.  


We're at 108, our expected high for today... heading for 109 tomorrow and 111 Tuesday and Wednesday in the central Sacramento Valley of California.


Is that hot enough to melt Quad Tape on the Sidewalk?  The forecast says it'll be hotter than the Fourth of July.





Ted


Ted Langdell
Secretary
Skype: 	TedLangdell
e-mail:	ted at quadvideotapegroup.com









______________________________________________
Please trim posts to relevant info when replying.

Change subject to reflect thread direction. Thanks.
_______________________________________________

Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20130701/2ac03e27/attachment-0005.html>