[QuadList] IVC Recovery (Was AMPEX VR-5100 WILL IT PLAY OTHER MACHINES TYPE A TAPE)
Steve White
Steve.White at 800CallNow.com
Fri May 16 16:13:19 CDT 2014
Impressive image. How'd you actually capture it?
Looking at the bottom of the screen, it appears this may not even be a
first generation tape. I'm actually a bit surprised to see what appear
to be consecutive tracking errors along the bottom. Can you tell us what
generation this might be; if any TBC was used; and so on ...
On 5/16/14, 5:05 PM, David Crosthwait wrote:
>
>
> Yes, the IVC has it's advantages especially in color reproduction.
> We've done a lot of 1" type A and 1" IVC over the last few years and
> IVC jobs are always more rewarding. Here's an image from an IVC tape:
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> David Crosthwait
> DC Video
> Preservation Level Videotape Transfers and More!
>
> Offices located at:
> 3071 North Lima St.
> Burbank, CA. 91504
> 818-563-1073
> 818-563-1177 (fax)
> 818-285-9942 (cell)
>
> david at dcvideo.com <mailto:david at dcvideo.com>
> http://dcvideo.com/
> Follow DC Video on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dcvideo
> Follow DC Video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/dcvideoonline
>
>
>
> On May 16, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Steve White wrote:
>
>>
>> IVC was the far superior machine ... because it was a totally
>> different format.
>>
>> You'll notice the Ampex used a moving pinch roller path with
>> resulting omega wrap around the drum, while the IVC used a fixed path
>> and alpha wrap.
>>
>>
>> On 5/16/14, 3:29 PM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ok! then ivc is not type A
>>> it is its own format huh?
>>> (In at case I hope it was really done on somethin else than an IVC!)
>>> Ed#
>>> In a message dated 5/16/2014 12:25:34 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
>>> dave at zfx.com writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any tape made on an IVC 1" machine will definitely not play on
>>> an Ampex 5100...
>>> completely different format, head drum size, #heads, tape speed,
>>> etc etc etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:20 PM, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com
>>> <mailto:COURYHOUSE at aol.com>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Don - Well if we never getting it working that is ok too
>>> as we have an Ampex camera that is a nice match for
>>> it... the TelePrompTer 1 inch tape was supposedly
>>> done on a IVC so we will try that.
>>> If it works that is great as we have no budget for outside
>>> services to convert it! So fingers are crossed!
>>> Ed#
>>> In a message dated 5/16/2014 11:41:05 A.M. Mountain Standard
>>> Time, dwnorwood at digitrakcom.com writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with many of the comments on this thread, is,
>>> we're talking about a format developed in the mid 60's,
>>> and a lot has changed since then!
>>> Don Norwood
>>>
>>> _
>>>
>>>
>>>
> We regularly do type A transfers. We have VR-7800, VPR-7900 and
> VPR-1's in their original A format.
>
> There never is a lack of surprises with the A format and pre-A format
> recordings.
>
> One A format issue is the deterioration of the tape stock. Other
> problem issues usually point to the lack of basic good engineering
> standards when the recording was made i.e. the operator did not know
> what he/she was doing.
>
> According to Jim Wheeler, the first use of the AST was the 7800 or
> 7900 machine although it may have been a prototype only.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> David Crosthwait
> DC Video
> /Transferring NTSC, PAL & SECAM quad and helical source tapes!/
>
> david at dcvideo.com <mailto:david at dcvideo.com>
> www.dcvideo.com <http://www.dcvideo.com/>
>
> Follow DC Video on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dcvideo
> Follow DC Video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/dcvideoonline
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying.
>
> Change subject to reflect thread direction. Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20140516/e8576738/attachment-0005.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpg
Size: 92074 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20140516/e8576738/attachment-0003.jpg>
More information about the QuadList
mailing list