[QuadList] TCR-100 (was 1" Machine glue)

Wayne Watson wayne.watson at sait.ca
Tue Feb 2 16:52:03 CST 2010


I have seen that. It was very scary; I think bicycle chains were involved :)
Good question though. Ampex used the same head for the AVR-1 and 25.  I believe Ampex ran 40 volts to the guide retract motor instead of the regular 24. That allowed it to be moved away faster for threading. Ampex used air and RCA used mechanical arms; but I guess you guys know this.

The SAIT BXST program and WABE need you help to recruit maintenance techs to join our industry. If you want to help please email info at wabe.ca<mailto:info at wabe.ca>
For information on the SAIT Broadcast Systems Technology Program, check out http://broadcast.sait.ca
Wayne Watson
Broadcast Systems Technology
wayne.watson at sait.ca<mailto:wayne.watson at sait.ca>
(403) 284 7079
SAIT Polytechnic
School of ICT
Room G239E
1301 16th Ave. N.W.
Calgary Alberta T2M 0L4


From: quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com [mailto:quadlist-bounces at quadvideotapegroup.com] On Behalf Of Don Norwood
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:45 PM
To: videovault at sky.com; Quad List
Subject: Re: [QuadList] TCR-100 (was 1" Machine glue)

I never had more than a casual look at the TCR-100, and didn't realize that it used the same head as the other machines.  Threading must have been quite a trick.  How did they do that?

Don
----- Original Message -----
From: Trevor Brown<mailto:videovault at sky.com>

Ampex head could be controlled better in the record domain to mach a standard replay
But then RCA did manage to keep the same head assembly for all their machines including the TCR 100

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20100202/6c21ffc7/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the QuadList mailing list