[QuadList] universal colortec (was why buy Quad)

[Don Norwood]

Shai:

The problem is that the TBC must be designed for segmented scan.  VERY FEW 
ever were, and I'm not aware that any on the market today or in recent years 
will work for anything other than non-segmented (helical) scan.

Don Norwood
Digitrak Communications, Inc.
www.digitrakcom.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shai Drori" <srdbx at netvision.net.il>
To: <quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [QuadList] universal colortec (was why buy Quad)


> Getting a 1200B that is NTSC and 525/625 is one thing. The problem is the 
> Universal colortec. I suggested to Tim that it might be possible to use 
> the regular TBC for NTSC and replace it with an external TBC like Kramer 
> for PAL. He was willing to try it if I hop over the Pond with a tape. If 
> that is possible it makes for one step to be a bit easier. This would make 
> a good multi standard machine.
> Shai
>
> On 29/04/2011 00:38, quadlist-request at quadvideotapegroup.com wrote:
>> The Universal Colortec is used in a PAL machine.  Does anyone know if  it
>> were possible to be used with NTSC?  I do not have any information on 
>> this.
>>
>> If not, you can take the Demodulator out and feed an external TBC for 
>> NTSC
>> playbacks.
>>
>> All together, because you want to do both NTSC and PAL, I would go with 
>> the
>>   VR-1200 B series.  That is my choice but there are many view on the 
>> issue.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying!
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com