[QuadList] An O/T but interesting topic--nitrate film of all built on top of high-power AM antenna radials--Safe?

Johan Glas trippedoverabox at gmail.com
Tue Mar 1 15:02:47 CST 2016


Nitrate is very dangerous burning, but try to start the fire, not easy. The
danger here pointed out seems minor to zero to me.

Johan Glas, the Netherlands
Op 1 mrt. 2016 20:58 schreef "Ted Langdell via QuadList" <
quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>:

>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ted Langdell <Ted at quadvideotapegroup.com>
> To: Peter Ford <pford at windowslive.com>
> Cc: "<quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>" <quadlist at quadvideotapegroup.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:58:14 -0800
> Subject: Re: An O/T but interesting topic--nitrate film of all built on
> top of high-power AM antenna radials--Safe?
> Hi Peter,
>
> Film cans as RF powered heaters.  Hmmm.
>
> There's at least one member of the group that might have a thought. I've
> forwarded this to him and he may reply either directly or through the
> group.
>
> Perhaps someone should be going into more than one of the vaults and doing
> some measurements with appropriate equipment?
>
> If the building is concrete and made with any kind of wire mesh in the
> concrete, is it possibly acting as a Faraday cage?
>
> Is there any plan to rebuild the taller antenna using the same antenna
> base, Et Cetera?
>
> When you have a chance, please feel free to share any stories about your
> use of the AVR-1 and other machines.
>
> Pictures that add to the story and don't take the message above one
> megabyte total will pass through the Mail system without a problem.
>
> Otherwise, I get a message that says I need to take a look and approve
> large files.
>
> Thanks again for an interesting subject.
>
>
>
> Ted
>
> Ted Langdell
> Secretary, Quad Videotape Group
> Ted at quadvideotapegroup.com
> (530)301-2931
>
> Dictated into and Sent from my iPhone, which is solely responsible for any
> weird stuff I didn't catch.
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Peter Ford <pford at windowslive.com> wrote:
>
> This is off topic, but members of the group may be able to help with
> advice as many of you have backgrounds in Radio and Television Broadcasting.
>
> A Film and Tape Audio-Visual Archive (where I have previously carried out
> quad restoration work using an AVR1 - the connection?) is not permitted to
> store Videotape/Safety Film and Nitro-Cellulose (Nitrate) film in the same
> building.  Except for very small quantities undergoing restoration the bulk
> of the Nitrate Film collection had to be stored in disused ammunition
> bunkers in an isolated spot in the countryside.
>
> About two years ago this Archive and the Government Archive combined their
> Nitrate Film Collections in a brand new purpose built climate controlled
> secure vault in a secret location.  Very commendable - but I have found the
> location and I see there may be a big problem.
>
> About 40 Km from the city centre is an AM Radio Transmission site.  There
> are five transmitters with a combined output of about 150 KW.  They had two
> masts one 220 meters high and the other 137 meters.  However  recently the
> 220 meter mast was discovered to have a corrosion problem and was dropped
> with explosives.  It was this activity that drew my attention to the site.
> To my surprise I  found the new Nitrate Film vault.  It had been built here
> over the top of the ground radials for the 220 meter mast and 0.5 km from
> the 137 meter mast.
>
> Nitrate Film is extremely flammable....it has almost the same composition
> as Nitro-Glycerine a very hot burning explosive (5000 degrees C).  Having a
> large quantity of this stuff located in a very strong RF electromagnetic
> field is asking for trouble.  The films are in individual metal containers
> stacked 8 high on painted metal shelving.  My theory is each stack of 8
> cans will be acting as an aerial and there will be a large RF potential
> difference between the bottom of the stacks and the shelving.  This is an
> ignition or detonation source only being suppressed by a thin layer of
> paint.  Because the transmitters run 24/7 if an arc starts it will not stop.
>
> I spoke to the local council about the danger.  They assured me the vault
> has a 4 hour fire rating therefore complied with regulations.
>
> Anyone agree with me this is a very dangerous situation?
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Please trim posts to relevant info when replying.
>
> Change subject to reflect thread direction. Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Send QuadList list posts to QuadList at quadvideotapegroup.com
> Your subscribe, unsubscribe and digest options are here:
>
> http://mail.quadvideotapegroup.com/mailman/listinfo/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://quadvideotapegroup.com/pipermail/quadlist_quadvideotapegroup.com/attachments/20160301/0dcd418d/attachment-0004.html>


More information about the QuadList mailing list